Austin DWI Lawyer Attorney Find Attorney DWI Austin Texas Attorney

Below, you will find extensive information on leading Austin DWI Lawyer Attorney Find Attorney DWI Austin Texas Attorney reviews articles and products to help you on your way to do much better than ever.
Austin Trial Lawyer, DWI Attorney and other DWI cases criminal lawyer charges including DWI Drug charges and Bar Ownership DWI dram shop law

Doug Goyen - Dallas DWI Attorney - Euless, Texas Drunk Driving Lawyer CALL (972) 599-4100 or Contact Us Online if you are charged with a DWI. In a DWI, the State must prove:

Texas Top DWI Drunk Driving Attorneys Lawyers are Members of “Americas Top DWI Defense Attorneys” who defend Texas DWI Drunk Driving arrests in all parts of Texas. Locate The Best

Austin DWI Attorney - Trichter & Murphy handle all drunk driving and criminal cases including drunk driving, drunk driving traffic crimes & license revocation

Austin DWI Criminal Defense Trial Attorney in Austin, Texas. DWI facts and information. Handling criminal defense cases as DWI, drunk driving. We win criminal DWI defense cases.

dwi attorney; dui attorney; dwi lawyer; dui lawyer; dwi defense; dui defense; defense attorney; defense lawyer; criminal attorney; criminal lawyer; criminal defense lawyer; criminal defense attorney

The law firm of Psoras and Psoras specialize in Baltimore criminal law, specifically for DWI, DUI, domestic violence, drug offenses, drug charges, assault, battery, murder and

When you get a DWI, if it’s your first or your fifth, you need to talk to a DUI /DWI attorney right away. Read More > DWI Victims

If you have been pulled over and charged for a DWI in the state of Maryland, contact our law firm today. Our Maryland criminal lawyers will represent you during your time of

Dane Johnson. Dane Johnson is a native Texan who has spent is entire life in the great state of Texas. Dane attended the University of Texas in Austin before receiving his Bachelor

Free confidential consultation - 713-225-8000 or toll-free 1-866-225-8009 b Main Office - Houston 515 Richmond Ave. Houston, TX 77006 Phone: 713-225-8000

November 6, 2007. Steve, I want to thank you and your staff for all your hard work. This has been one of the toughest years of my life. I put my faith in God and trust in you, Jed

Drewry Vallejo DUI/DWI Defense Of Donald Gray Drewry Attorney Northern California DUI /DWI Attorney Donald Gray Drewry Attorney At Law

Want to know the best DWI facts at Austin TX DWI Attorney? General - DWI News: Getting Out of Jail in Austin, Texas. Getting out of jail - City of Austin

In Texas, if you are arrested for driving while intoxicated, in order to preserve your right to drive, you must immediately request an administrative license revocation (ALR

If you have been arrested for a second or third DUI or DWI, contact DWI lawyer John F. Marshall (Toll-free: 877-450-8301) for a free consultation about defense of multiple DUI

Mace Yampolsky, DWI Attorney at Law 625 S. 6th Street, Las Vegas, NV 89101 Phone: 702-385-9777, FAX: 702-385-9777 e-mail: mace@macelaw.com

Free initial consultation. If you have been arrested for drunk driving, contact the personable, experienced DWI attorney Denver G. McCarty. The Law Offices of Denver G. McCarty

Galveston C ounty Texas DWI-attorney-questions - M ontgomery C ounty-TX DWI attorney defense tactics - H arris C ounty T exas DWI attorney jury trial - H ouston T exas DWI legalities - P oking holes with a H... attorney.needtip.com

My dwi austin texas, DWI, Community Caretaking and High Crime Areas in Austin, Texas

I was waiting in Travis County Court #7 this morning to talk to the judge about a post conviction occupational driver’s license. Meanwhile, a pretrial motion to suppress had already started.

From what I could gather, the officer had seen a car pulled off on the side of the road. The defense attorney was doing a good job pointing out through cross examination that no traffic violations had been witnessed.

Apparently, the State was attempting to justify the initial detention through the ‘community caretaking’ exception. Community caretaking is shorthand for the legal concept in Texas that the police can legally detain you ‘for your own good’. Of course, since it’s only litigated in the criminal context, that means they ended up arresting you for one thing or another, so how much good it ended up doing you is questionable at best.

So the officer had pulled over ‘to investigate,’ I suppose, but I had missed that part of the testimony, when this little gem came up:

* Defense attorney: Was there anything unsafe about stopping in that neighborhood?
* Officer: Well, any area in Austin can be unsafe.
* Defense attorney: Do you consider that to be a high crime area?
* Officer: All areas in Austin can be ‘high crime’.

Exactly! There’s no place in Austin, in Texas, or really in the world that an officer can’t characterize as “could be a high crime neighborhood’.

So, when an arresting officer testifies that “part of the reason I detained him was to investigate due to it being a high crime area,’ appellate courts need to stop pretending that adds any logical or legal basis for a stop or a detention. Is this really how low we want our standards to sink?

Like most of the affronts to our constitution, no one cares about this sort of erosion of civil rights… until they are arrested for DWI… dwi.austindefense.com

My Fair Copyright for Canada Principles

With the continued interest in Canadian copyright reform - the Fair Copyright for Canada Facebook group has grown to over 38,000 members and the local chapters across the country are gaining significant momentum - the most frequently asked question I receive is "what do you think fair copyright reform looks like?" In other words, we know that tens of thousands of Canadians oppose a Canadian DMCA, but what kind of reform would or should they support? Many groups have already responded to this question - librarians, teachers, universities, musicians, artists, consumer interests, and some large businesses opposed to a Canadian DMCA among them. Although the optimal approach would be to launch a public consultation on the issue, there is reason to doubt that the government will do so. In that case, I would point to eight key principles that should be addressed to maintain a balanced, fair approach to Canadian copyright law. Take the Copyright Pledge. All Members of Parliament should be comfortable with the principle that they will not "introduce, support, or endorse any copyright bill that, either directly or indirectly, undermines or weakens the Copyright Act’s fair dealing provision." Fair dealing, which forms a crucial part of the copyright balance, is critically important for education and free speech and deserves full support from politicians regardless of party affiliation. Anti-circumvention provisions should be directly linked to copyright infringement. The anti-circumvention provisions have been by far the most controversial element of the proposed reforms. The experience in the United States, where anti-circumvention provisions effectively trump fair use rights, provides the paradigm example of what not do to. It should only be a violation of the law to circumvent a technological protection measure (TPM) if the underlying purpose is to infringe copyright. Circumvention should be permitted to access a work for fair dealing or private copying purposes. This approach - which is similar (though not identical) to the failed Bill C-60 - would allow Canada to implement the World Intellectual Property Organization’s Internet treaties and avoid some of the negative "unintended consequences" that have arisen under the U.S. law. No ban on devices that can be used to circumvent a TPM. Canada should not ban devices that can be used to circumvent a TPM. The reason is obvious - if Canadians cannot access the tools necessary to exercise their user rights under the Copyright Act, those rights are effectively extinguished in the digital world. If organizations are permitted to use TPMs to lock down content in a manner that threatens fair dealing, Canadians should have the right to access and use technologies that restores the copyright balance. Expand the fair dealing provision by establishing "flexible fair dealing." Led by the United States, several countries around the world have established fair use provisions within their copyright laws (Israel being the most recent). The Supreme Court of Canada has already ruled that Canada's fair dealing provision must be interpreted in a broad and liberal manner. Yet the law currently includes a limited number of categories (research, private study, criticism, news reporting) that renders everyday activities such as recording television programs acts of infringement. The ideal remedy is to address other categories such as parody, time shifting, and format shifting by making the current list of fair dealing categories illustrative rather than exhaustive. Establish a legal safe harbour for Internet intermediaries supported by a "notice and notice" takedown system. The creation of a legal safe harbour that protects Internet intermediaries from liability for the actions of their users is critically important to foster a robust and vibrant online world. Indeed, without such protections, intermediaries (which include Internet service providers, search engines, video sites, blog hosts, and individual bloggers) frequently remove legitimate content in the face of legal threats. Canadian law should include an explicit safe harbour that insulates intermediaries from liability where they follow a prescribed model that balances the interests of users and content owners. The ideal Canadian approach would be a "notice and notice" system that has been used successfully for many years on an informal basis. Modernize the backup copy provision. As part of the 1988 copyright reform, Canadian copyright law was amended to allow for the making of backup copies of computer programs. In 1988, backing up digital data meant backing up software programs. Today, digital data includes CDs, DVDs, and video games. All of these products suffer from the same frailties as software programs, namely the ease with which hard drives become corrupted or CDs and DVDs scratched and non-functional. From a policy perspective, the issue is the same - ensuring that consumers have a simple way to protect their investment. "Modernizing" copyright law should include bringing this provision into the 21st century by expanding the right to make a backup copy to all digital consumer products. Rationalize the statutory damages provision. Canada is one of the only countries in the world to have a statutory damages provision within its copyright legislation. It creates the prospect of massive liability - up to $20,000 per infringement - without any evidence of actual loss. This system may have been designed for commercial-scale infringement, but its primary use today is found in the U.S. where statutory damages led to the massive liability for one peer-to-peer file sharing defendant and leaves many defendants with little option but settlement. Before Canada faces similar developments, we should amend the statutory damages provision by clarifying that it only applies in cases of commercial gain. Include actual distribution in the making available right. The new bill will likely include a "making available" provision that will grant copyright holders the exclusive right to make their works available. While there is reason to believe that Canadian law already features a making available right, any new provision should require actual distribution, which ensures that liability only flows from real harm. There are many other issues worthy of consideration (private copying and crown copyright among them), which is why a broad consultation is needed. In the absence of a consultation, however, Canadians should be writing to Industry Minister Jim Prentice and to their local MP to urge them not only to drop plans for a Canadian DMCA, but to also introduce a positive agenda that features a genuine made-in-Canada copyright solution.
Source: feeds.feedburner.com

Austin Texas DWI Attorney & DWI Lawye

If You're Still Undecided About Fighting Your Texas DWI, please read the information below:

A DWI Conviction Could Cost You: I've found that most people have a serious misconception about the cost of their DWI.

They believe that pleading guilty is going to save them money over the cost of hiring an attorney and fighting the charge. Better think again.

This is a table showing the costs of a DWI conviction here in Texas.

* Cost to Tow Your Car $150.00
* Average Fine $500
* Community Service Hours (at Min. wage) $309
* Probation Fees $1,488.00
* License Reinstatement Fee $125
* Add These Probable Additional Costs
* Alcohol Education Classes $135
* Auto Insurance Increase Varies *
* Minimum DWI Surcharge: $3,000

As you can see, the average cost for just pleading guilty is at least $5,207.00, not including your attorney fees, or how much your insurance company will surcharge you. That could be an additional $1,000.00 or more a year for three years.

In addition, you need to seriously keep possible jail time in mind. For a first offense, you probably won't get any jail time. But if you ever get arrested and convicted for a 2nd DWI offense, you're looking at mandatory jail time of 3 to 30 days.

Not too pleasant a picture, is it?

On the other hand, if you fight and are successful in keeping a DWI conviction off your record, you can avoid these charges, plus the raise in your insurance rates.

So let me ask you quite simply . . . can you afford not to fight the charge?

Because, you see, even without attorney costs, you're still looking at up to a minimum of $5,206.14 in non-attorney costs. And you'll always have the DWI conviction on your record. And this could seriously hurt you now and in the future.

* does not include the gouging you will get from your insurance company when it is time to renew your policy, and that is if they don’t cancel your policy all together.

* The DWI Surcharge could be as high as $6,000.00, depending on the facts of your case.


THIS INFORMATION I HAVE FOUND IN AUSTINTEXASDWI.COM . I AM SHARING ANY INFORMATION THAT CAN HELP YOU IN YOUR DWI SITUTATION.....MICHELLE STONE